Are we still going to eat fish?
May 15th 2008 05:06
Probably not, if the scientists are correct about the looming seafood crisis.
One of the luxuries about living in Sydney, is being able to go to the fish markets and see the incredible variety and volume of fresh fish. Elsewhere in the world, the fish markets are even more spectacular - and bizarre.
Fish is wildly heralded as an excellent source of protein and essential acids, a healthy substitute for the slabs of red meat that we normally eat. At the same time, however, fish is eyed suspiciously for its mercury content and concerns over whether we should be eating it.
Alex Renton in the Guardian has a gloomy article about the decline of fish stocks in the world's oceans. He notes that the scientific community has identified that the fishing industry is unsustainable since the 50s, but governments have done little to reverse the trend.
That's hard to digest, thinking about the sheer waste of fish. As consumers, we're safely insulated to the actual process that fishing boats use. What is the effect on marine life?
And for people - fish could be a magnificent way to feed the world's population, but if it's approached with this short term vision, we're in for trouble:
One of the luxuries about living in Sydney, is being able to go to the fish markets and see the incredible variety and volume of fresh fish. Elsewhere in the world, the fish markets are even more spectacular - and bizarre.
Fish is wildly heralded as an excellent source of protein and essential acids, a healthy substitute for the slabs of red meat that we normally eat. At the same time, however, fish is eyed suspiciously for its mercury content and concerns over whether we should be eating it.
Alex Renton in the Guardian has a gloomy article about the decline of fish stocks in the world's oceans. He notes that the scientific community has identified that the fishing industry is unsustainable since the 50s, but governments have done little to reverse the trend.
"Do they not know that industrial fishing is so inefficient that a third of the catch, some 32 million tonnes a year, is thrown away? For every ocean prawn you eat, fish weighing 10-20 times as much have been thrown overboard."
That's hard to digest, thinking about the sheer waste of fish. As consumers, we're safely insulated to the actual process that fishing boats use. What is the effect on marine life?
"Callum Roberts, professor of marine conservation at York University, predicts that by 2050 we will only be able to meet the fish protein needs of half the world population: all that will be left for the unlucky half may be, as he puts it, 'jellyfish and slime'."
| 71 |
| Vote |





Comments (5)
Add Comments
Read More














